Generative Artificial Intelligence Guiding Principles
The University of Jamestown recognizes the presence of generative artificial intelligence tools, both in an academic setting and in our broader society. These guidelines aim to allow, where supported, the purposeful use of generative artificial intelligence in your academic experience while supporting learning, preserving fairness, and respecting the diverse perspectives of our community. These guidelines provide a foundation for students and instructors when considering or utilizing educational aids responsibly while maintaining academic integrity.
It is important to review any individual program guidelines that also cover artificial intelligence as they may have their specific policies. Each course syllabus has an “AI Statement” that outlines the individual course’s expectations when it comes to what is expected when it comes to considering utilizing generative artificial intelligence tools. This tiered approach guides down to the individual course level while providing flexibility to adjust to rapidly evolving tools and discipline-specific needs.
Students who are alleged to have violated academic integrity attributed to unauthorized educational aid usage must follow the Academic Integrity Policy reporting process. Students should first work with their instructor, and only when they fail to resolve the concern, should they follow the Academic Integrity Policy dispute process.
Guidelines
-
Cite sources and be transparent
-
Students must acknowledge the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in their work when it is allowed within a course. This includes citing the specific tool utilized and clearly explaining how it was used to support their work (e.g., brainstorming, drafting, revisions, etc.). Seek instructor clarification if unclear when and how to cite usage.
-
Generative artificial intelligence can be utilized to support individual intellectual efforts but should not be used as a replacement. Wise usage of these tools can support holistic development and career preparation; however, poor usage and a misunderstanding of how generative artificial intelligence tool usage can impact one’s academic journey could inadvertently cause academic integrity violations - to the detriment of yourself and the academic community.
The generative AI policy developed by Boston University inspired these guiding principles.
“Policy on the Use of AI Text Generation,” Boston University, https://www.bu.edu/files/2023/02/GAIA-Final-2023.pdf. Accessed September 2024.
Other Student Notes
Individual assignment or assessment grade disputes on anything other than academic integrity violations will not be reviewed, and students are directed to follow the Grade Appeal Process once they are awarded a final grade in the course.
The Dean of Academic Affairs will determine appropriate disciplinary action for cases of inappropriate collaboration or other violations involving students not enrolled in the reporting instructor’s course.
In cases of multiple violations, the Dean of Academic Affairs, in consultation with relevant parties, may impose additional sanctions.